Revision guide
IB English A Language & Literature
How to build arguments, handle unseen texts, and write the essays that earn marks in Lang & Lit.
English A Language & Literature sits at the intersection of literary analysis and media criticism — you're asked to read carefully, think about context, and write persuasively about both literary texts and non-literary texts in the real world. The course rewards students who can construct a clear argument and use textual evidence precisely; it does not reward padding, vague assertions, or summary.
The most common mistake is treating every task as an English essay in the traditional sense. Examiners are looking for conceptual reasoning about how language makes meaning — the register choices, the rhetorical devices, the contextual pressures on a text — not just identification of features. Developing this habit of reading for construction, not just content, is the single highest-leverage skill in the course.
How you're assessed
Paper 1 (Guided Literary Analysis)
Two unseen texts — one literary, one non-literary — and a choice of guided question for each. The guide narrows your focus but doesn't write the essay for you. Successful responses build a clear argument around the guide, integrate relevant terminology, and select evidence deliberately rather than citing every technique they spot.
Paper 2 (Comparative Essay)
A choice of general questions requiring you to compare at least two of your Part 1 texts from memory. This is the paper students underestimate: no notes, two texts in dialogue, one argument. The top responses state a clear comparative thesis in the first paragraph and sustain it through each body paragraph rather than ping-ponging between texts without direction.
Individual Oral (IO)
A 10-minute oral (plus 5-minute discussion) structured around a global issue and an extract from each of two texts — one literary, one non-literary. You choose the extracts and the global issue. The best IOs have a specific, arguable claim about how both texts treat the issue, not just a topic they both touch on.
Higher Level Essay (HL only)
A formal essay on one of your Part 3 texts or a real-world body of work. You propose your own question and write 1,200–1,500 words. The HL Essay is marked against criteria including line of inquiry, analysis of the chosen body of work, and use of secondary sources — it rewards independent thinking more than the exam papers do.
How to revise
Know your texts structurally
For each Part 1 text, know the arc of the whole work and be able to identify five or six key passages in detail. In Paper 2 you reconstruct from memory — a small set of well-known moments beats a vague impression of the whole.
Practise unseen analysis regularly
Paper 1 improvement comes almost entirely from practice volume. Find unseen texts — newspaper opinion pieces, short stories, advertisements, speeches — and write 20-minute analytical paragraphs. Speed and selectivity improve with repetition more than any other technique.
Build a conceptual vocabulary, not just a technique list
Naming a metaphor earns nothing on its own. What matters is the claim: how does that metaphor construct a particular version of the subject, and why does that matter in context? Frame every textual reference as an answer to those two questions.
Practise comparative thesis statements
Before Paper 2, write ten thesis statements comparing your texts on different themes. A thesis is not 'both texts deal with identity' — it is a specific claim about how they treat it differently or converge on an unexpected dimension. Writing these under timed pressure before the exam removes the blank-page problem on the day.
Mistakes examiners see every year
Writing character analysis in Paper 2 instead of thematic/stylistic comparison — texts are tools for meaning, not characters to be discussed.
Over-quoting: long block quotes suggest you can't select evidence. One well-chosen line is better than a paragraph.
Using the guide as a prompt to list everything rather than to focus the argument.
Choosing a global issue for the IO that's too broad (e.g., 'inequality') — a specific, arguable version ('how economic inequality is aestheticized to avoid critique') produces a much sharper oral.
Running out of time on Paper 1 by spending the first 40 minutes on one text — allocate roughly equal time to both.
What's in the syllabus
Readers, writers and texts
Text type conventions · Purpose and audience · Tone · Diction · Imagery · Structure · Narrative voice
Time and space
Context · Intertextuality · Representation · Culture · Historical setting · Perspective
Intertextuality
Comparison · Motifs · Genre conventions · Allusion · Adaptation · Critical lenses
Assessment skills
Paper 1 guided analysis · Paper 2 comparative essay · Global issue framing · Individual oral extracts · Thesis writing
Frequently asked questions
How is Lang & Lit different from Lit?
Literature studies only literary texts and goes deeper into literary tradition and intertextuality. Lang & Lit includes non-literary texts (media, advertising, political speech, journalism) and explicitly examines how language constructs meaning in real-world contexts.
Can I choose any global issue for the IO?
Yes — it must be a global issue (local situations connected to broader patterns) and it must be genuinely reflected in both texts. The more specific your issue, the easier it is to produce a focused and original argument.
How much do I need to know about the author's life?
Context is assessed, but biographical trivia is not. What matters is how context shapes meaning: the historical moment, the intended audience, the purpose of the text. Stick to context that actually illuminates your argument.
Put this guide into practice
Everything above — topic-filtered practice questions, spaced-repetition flashcards, and a syllabus checklist for English A Language & Literature — is free on Baccly.
Start free